Tsirigo's orbit logo

Tremonti contro La Marcegaglia: Un Ritorno al Passato?

Blog - TremontiL’affermazione di Giuliano Tremonti  l’altro giorno : <<La mobilita’ non e’ un valore, il posto fisso e’ la base per progetti di vita>>  ha creato uno scompiglio.  Da Confindustria, in particolare, Marcegaglia non ha sprecato alcun tempo con questa risposta, <<E’ un ritorno al passato non possibile, che peraltro in questo Paese ha creato problemi>>.

Sarebbe facile cadere vittima di questi commenti politici, comunque, soltanto per un momento, ci eleviamo al di sopra delle chiacchere e si deve pensare  tralasciando l’emozione.  In un certo senso tutte e due le affermazioni sono corrette…la verita’ sta nel mezzo.

Il posto pubblico nella storia d’Italia e’ ovviamente molto importante e’ una parte del suo DNA.  Infatti capisco molto chiaramente che si deve capire il passato per  andare avanti. Sono d’accordo con un amico che mi ha scritto questo pensiero, “L’importante oggi e’ inziare ad avere una certezza di lavoro e pertanto di esistenza, per tirare avanti se stessi e l’eventuale famiglia”.   Inoltre  sono d’accordo con quelli che  pensano che le banche, assieme ai politici, sono colpevoli di questa rovina.  Appunto ma…

Dall’altra parte interpreto la posizione di Marcegaglia e il suo significato diBlog - Marcegaglia cambiamento, ma non come lo slogan di Obama, “Si puo’ fare”, che sarebbe troppo facile, comunque, vederlo come una sveglia per il paese e forse per tutto il mondo.  Oggi, piaccia o no,l’economia dell’Italia e’ molto legata a cio’ che accade al mondo.

Il mondo economico sta cambiando troppo velocemente.  La definizione tradizionale di lavoro o posto fisso e’ caduta.  Anche adesso in America in cui la disoccupazione e’ circa il 10%, la gente stenta a trovare un lavoro.  Molte persone aspettano ansiosamente per la ripresa mentre la prospettiva di una ripresa senza lavoro  si profila enorme.

Entrambe la gente e il governo devono essere onesti con se stessi e  devono rendersi conto che il mondo del lavoro ha cambiato.  Devono preparsi per un futuro pieno di cambiamenti,  turbolenze,  e di incertezze.  Purtroppo questa e’ la realta’.

Come stai preparandoti per questa nuova economia?

Share/Save/Bookmark
You can edit this ad by going editing the index.php file or opening /images/exampleAd.gif

A Fine Mess Caused by the Fine Print

“I was going to hire a company today to do something fairly simple that Blog - Fine Printwould have cost [an advertised] $45,” begins a post at the Service Untitled blog. But there was a catch. “I called them to schedule an appointment and was told there was [an] $85 minimum service charge. The fact that I was a first time customer didn’t matter. Essentially, I would have to pay $85 for a $45 service.”

Here are some things to consider before you implement minimum service charges:

  • They have the potential to scare off customers, in no small part because they blatantly favor the interests of a vendor. “For the company,” says the blog, “it’s upselling disguised as a policy.”
  • No one who plans to take action appreciates learning that information contained in the fine print nearly doubles an advertised price. “If you’re going to have a minimum service fee,” says Service Untitled, “at least be forthcoming about it and tell your customers exactly how much it is and what they can get for that amount in the very beginning.”

The Po!nt: Over the relatively paltry sum of $40, this company lost twice: It sent a potential customer running and earned negative word-of-mouth in the process. “The most important thing to do,” says Service Untitled, “is to think of the long-term value of your average customer.”

Source: Marketing Profs

Share/Save/Bookmark

Una Critica – Film di Michael Moore… Capitalismo, una storia d’amore

Blog - Michael MooreHo deciso, oggi, di andare a vedere l’ultimo film di Michael Moore intitolato:”Capitalismo, una storia d’amore”.  Moore e’ famoso per i documentari come “Bowling for Columbine, Farenheit 9/11”,(vincitore del premio Oscar) e “Sicko”.

Questa volta Moore, nel suo stile unico di umorisimo all’ indignazione,  prende il concetto di capitalismo.  Come sempre lui non e’ timido e suggerisce che il capitalismo e’ cattivo e responsabile sia per la distruzione dei nostri valori sociali, e sia per il crollo della borsa del 2008: risultato,questo, provocato da Wall Street: dalla sua avidita’,e dalla voglia di acquistare di piu’ senza  riguardo per il resto della societa’ che non ha molto.

Ci sono certi punti di cui sono d’accordo con Moore.  In quanto secondo me e’ vero che, probabilmente il Governo e Wall Street erano legati in un modo tale da influenzarsi a vicenda promovendo, cosi’, i loro investimenti in cui: i ricchi, avrebbero potuto continuare a guadagnare molti soldi, mentre i politici, con il sostegno di Wall Street, avrebbero potuto continuare a fare politica.  Comunque, si deve tenere presente che il film rappresenta il punto di vista di Moore, il quale a sua volta mostra i fatti per far validare la sua prospettiva.

Sebbene Moore facesse vedere: Tim Geitner,attuale Segretario del Tesoro, quando ancora era membro del Federal Reserve Board di New York, come incompetente, ha dimenticato di dire, pero’,che e’ stato scelto da Obama per il suo attuale incarico.

Il problema qual’e’?

La risposta e’: che attraverso questo film Moore e’ pronto a criticare Il Presidente Bush, ma, mi ha colpito che, poiche’ e’ un grande sostenitore di Obama, non lo critichi mai per il suo coinvolgimento nel crollo dell’ economia.

Questo film non e’ il suo capo lavoro, comunque, vale la pena di vederlo.  E’ stimolante e ci lascia con la domanda, “C’e’ un altro modo finanziario che il capitalismo?”

Share/Save/Bookmark

Linked Out

Not long ago, Elaine Fogel used a post at the MarketingProfs Daily Fix Blog. blog to discuss her case of “Social Media Rejection Syndrome.” It all began when someone not only rejected her LinkedIn invitation but also sent a note explaining why: “I only make connections with people I’ve met personally or have worked with, but perhaps our paths will cross in person one day.”

Blog - Linked OutAt the same time, Fogel received a warning from LinkedIn. “Please note,” it read. “This message is a notice that you are nearing the threshold of ‘I don’t know’ responses you can receive before you will be required to enter an email address when sending invitations. Please remember to only invite people you know.”

Fogel was confused by the rejection—even though it was friendly—and by the severity of LinkedIn’s note. This was the first time anyone had declined her invitation with the “I don’t know” response. And why all the drama? Don’t social-networking sites like LinkedIn exist so professionals can connect with each other?

Her post generated a lively discussion in which she discovered just how differently many people use social networks. In the case of LinkedIn, she discovered, users are encouraged to make connections only with people they know well. The user who rejected her was simply following an explicit guideline that Fogel was unaware of.

Now enlightened, she has reported on her findings in a new post, and even gathered many of the responses—along with some of her conclusions—in a downloadable whitepaper.

The Po!nt: Don’t assume everyone will treat each social network in the same way—that customer or colleague who gladly interacts on Facebook or Twitter might be less obliging in a less casual space like LinkedIn.

Source: MarketingProfs Daily Fix Blog. Click here for the full post.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Peripheral Vision

If we were to ask you to describe your competition, you’d probably talk about companies that do exactly what you do. The owner of an Indian restaurant will discuss other Indian restaurants, for instance, while a florist will focus on rival flower shops. That approach is completely Blog - Peripheral Visionunderstandable—they are, after all, direct competitors.

But if you let your vision get too category-specific, you might miss the fact that you’re also competing with companies that offer products and services quite unlike your own.

“On any given night,” explains Rohit Bhargava at the Influential Marketing Blog, “any Indian restaurant might compete with a fast food joint, or even a grocery store. The flower shop might compete with a chocolate store on Valentine’s day, or even with charitable causes when it comes to donations people make in memory of their departed loved ones.”

Battle your indirect competition head-on. One way to lure customers from alternate categories is to make yours the more convenient option.

“People decide on dentists, dry cleaners, gas stations and much more based on little more than whether or not you happen to be on their way home,” he says. Another is to demonstrate how your product or service addresses their underlying need in a way they might not have considered.

The Po!nt: “As marketers and businesspeople, we often focus on fighting against our competition,” says Bhargava. “Sometimes, the better course might just be to see if you’re even fighting against the right foe.”

Source: Marketing Profs

Share/Save/Bookmark

What I'm trying to say is…

Blog - MProfs 1“If you think your website content isn’t working for you,” says Rick Sloboda of Webcopyplus, “you’re probably right. And the realization that you need something better is a step in the right direction. But what’s the next step?”

He recommends a brainstorming process that wipes the slate clean with two fundamental questions:

  • What content will encourage sales of my product or service?
  • What content will encourage visitors buy from me and not from a competitor?

“Once you’ve got some ideas,” he says, “start thinking about what your visitors might want to do on your website, and what content would help them complete those tasks.”

After you create a list of topics your website should cover, describe why that content is necessary. “This will ensure that every topic, large or small, has a purpose,” notes Sloboda.

So if your topic is Read About Our Creative Team, for instance, your notes might look like this:

  • What content do I need? Profiles and pictures of individuals on the team, including a list of their projects, credentials and awards.
  • Why do I need it? To put a public face on the team, so visitors can see the team is qualified, talented and friendly.

The Po!nt: If you’re unhappy with your website, tweaking copy here or there might not be enough—consider a ground-up reassessment of your content.

Source: MarketingProfs

Share/Save/Bookmark

iPhone e Un Imprenditore Italiano in America

Da Wave Factory…”Abbiamo avuto il piacere di intervistare Giuseppe Taibi, ingegnere ed imprenditore siciliano trapiantato a Boston, Fondatore e CEO di SmartWorlds inc, software house statunitense specializzata nella realizzazione di applicazioni per iPhone.”

Share/Save/Bookmark

Business Plans: Why You Need One and Why They May Not Deliver

“A strong business plan is essentially the cornerstone of your business and yet many entrepreneurs drag their feet when it comes to writing one – possibly because it involves a good deal of work and may bring back childhood memories of writing a tedious book report on summer vacation,” according to Coleen DeBaise from her upcoming book “The Wall Street Journal Complete Small Business Guidebook”.  She goes on to state her reasons why:

It forces you to identify your (and your company’s) strengths and weaknesses.

It helps you figure out how much money you’ll need.Business Charts & Graphs

It gives you clear direction, which can help eliminate stress.

It will serve as a resume when you seek lenders, investors or partners.

It makes you evaluate the market for your product or service and size up the competition.

These are all solid reasons to create a plan yet is there something missing?  The term business plan has become rather cliché but what about the notion of what it takes to write a successful plan.

In my reading I came across a helpful article by John W. Mullins in the WSJ entitled “Why Business Plans Don’t Deliver”.  Mullins discusses his “Five oh-so-common varieties of plans that go quickly into the trash without further consideration.”  Not only does he identify these five types but he emphasizes “the three key elements that go into a successful business plan: a logical statement of problem and its solution; a battery of cold, hard evidence; and candor about the risks, gaps and other assumptions that might be proved wrong.”

Mullins’ five problematic types of plans are summarized below:

Here I am, never mind the problem

“In this kind of plan the writer is smitten with the elegance of his or her technology.  The plan begins not with the identification of a customer problem to solve but with a detailed explanation how the technology works…”

A Coke for every kid in China

“The gambit rests its case on a plethora of secondary data to show how large and fast-growing a market is.”  “….with the large number of customers in our market, we’ll easily get enough.”  Sadly it is never quite that simple.

Just look at our (paper) profits

Often referred to as ‘dream sheets’ one can easily Excel just about anything to a successful conclusion.  While at times difficult to spot, those with a critical eye can certainly ask the tough, poigniant questions that can quickly turn a projected profit into something far less desirable.

Our team walks on water

Pedigree is nice but does the team have the hands-on experience to take on your plan’s challenges.  “A business plan that identifies its critical success factors and shows how the team’s expertise and experience are suited to addressing is much more likely to attract capital-or at least a second look.”

Everything is wonderful

“The most common type of business plan and the one that goes most quickly into the trash, is the one in which the writer can’t find anything but good things to say about the opportunity and plans to pursue it. Rather than attempt to paper over the rough spots and uncertainty, identify them yourself and deal with them candidly in your plan.”

What do you think makes someone want to read your business plan?  Is your plan guilty of some of the 5 items noted above?

Share/Save/Bookmark

Riorganizzando le riunioni di lunedi’

Le riunioni occupano una grande parte di una giornata lavorativa.  United around the tableProbabilmente tutti noi abbiamo participato in una riunione di lunedi’ mattina che  un dirigente discuteva le cose da fare per la settimana.  Spesso si vede questo incontro come lungo, senza una direzione, ed e’ considerato spesso piuttosto noisoso.

In un articolo di Wall Street Journal Online Jessica Rovello, un’ imprenditrice e fondatrice di Arkadium, un’ azienda che sviluppa i giochi online,  ha deciso di  cambiare questa riunione settimanale perche’ era diventata una routine banale.  Jessica Rovello ha detto, “E’ un modo per tenere tutti interessati e coinvolti.”

Jessica Rovello e’ fortunata di gestire un ambiente cosi’ creativo.    Ha riorganizzato  la riunione in cui ogni settimana c’e’ un conduttore nuovo ed una persona diversa da ogni  dipartimento a cui e’ chiesto di presentare qualcosa.  Con il fine di mantenere l’attenzione e l’interesse  occasionalmente ci sono le sorprese!

Mentre il suo business si comporta in una maniera informale confronto al mondo di lavoro tradizionale, si puo’ imparare qualcosa da lei?  Hai mai participato in una riunione che non  era tipica?  E’ possibile per un’azienda tradizionale avere le riunioni che sono come quella della Rovello senza perdere la sua credibilita’?

Share/Save/Bookmark

Revamping Monday Meetings

United around the tableAt one time or another we have all had to sit through Monday morning meetings.  Entrepreneur Jessica Rovello tells us how she came up with an innovative way to solve a routine problem in her business in a recent story from the WSJ’s “Fast Fixes” feature for Small Business.  “Rovello decided that she needed to revamp the weekly company meeting, which had become a mundane operation where the same people would talk over and over.”

Ms. Rovello is fortunate that she works in a very creative environment, her company develops online flash-based games, where as she says, “It’s a way to keep everyone interested, informed and involved.”  She involves different hosts for each meeting and a different person from each department is asked to present.   Having spent many years in the advertising industry, I can attest that novel approaches can succeed not only in the Monday gathering but other types of meetings, too.

Have you seen or tried any unique approaches to hosting internal staff meetings?  Can traditional environments be more creative with their gatherings without being seen as “silly”?

Share/Save/Bookmark